PURCHASING INSTRUCTIONS: After reviewing the descriptions of available publications and subscription services proceed directly to the GO TO SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES CART to purchase your selections.


THE SOCIOLOGY CENTERTN provides the only sociology of knowledgeSM based analysis and commentary. Political and social commentary are based upon James Roger Brown's aggregate government experience, specialized research in the sociology of intelligence operations and organized crime in government and his holographic paradigm theory of social processes. Click here to see sample political analysis and commentary article below. Due to the intense research necessary for some articles, THE SOCIOLOGY CENTERTN guarantees a minimum of 12 commentaries per year. Annual subscription are $49.00.


Ask The SociologistTN is the only sociology of knowledgeSM based column in the world that solicits questions from the public about family, political, and social problems, then conducts the necessary information research to explain how the problem is produced. The purpose of Ask The SociologistTN is to provide sufficient understanding of the social processes which produce and sustain problems that the individual with the question may make an informed decision about a course of action. In effect, Ask The SociologistTN provides the general public with its own and only dedicated sociological researcher.

Anyone may submit questions, but only subscribers and the individual who submitted it will have immediate access to the researched finished response. Due to the intense research necessary to answer each individual Ask The SociologistTN question, THE SOCIOLOGY CENTERTN guarauntees a minimum of 12 commentaries per year. Annual subscription are $49.00. Click here to see sample Ask The SociologistTN column below. Add To Shopping Cart.


Subscribe to both for the special annual price of $80.00.



Let me tell you why. All those free analysis and commentary web sites are giving it away because they want to influence your decision-making and probably direct your voting and social commitment, not because they want to provide you with objective information and insights. The income needed to sustain their operations are obtained by soliciting contributions from those who agree with them or by placing banner ads that sell the products or services of others.

My services are unique on the Internet. I own a for-profit business that provides sociology of knowledge based publications, services, anaylysis, and commentary. If I do not provide competent reliable services to the people who pay for them I go out of busines. For example, since 1995, I have analyzed documentary evidence in false child abuse allegation cases to determine the truth. This analysis was based on having developed methods and procedures to detect and document evidence falsification, science fraud, and orgnaized crime operating in the child protection and child abuse investigation systems. Every case in which I did the documentary evidence analysis resulted in a "Not Guilty" verdict.

What you are purchasing is access to the objective analytical skills and specialized knowledge that produced those results. In addition, I have worked in a series of position for which lives depended on the quaility of my analytical skills, this included working in public health, transportation safety evaluation, and reverse engineering exotic covert actions. My 1978 Masters Thesis was a qualitative analysis World War II intelligence operations. Try to identify anyone else with a similar background offering you these services.

I will tell you someting important that I doubt anyone has told you your entire life.

By purchasing these subscriptions directly from the source, you ensure yourself access to an objective source of analysis and insights. I do not report to a New York Times or any other editor. I am not subject to revenue blackmail by advertisers or a sydicate distributing my columns. My business is not owned by a conservative or liberal media mogul. Here, and only here, you will get what you pay for.




James Roger Brown
October 5, 2003

George W. Bush is suffering a twofold disaster of his own making. First, he lied and forced the falsification of intelligence to create a national security pretext for the pursuit of a Bush family personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein. In pursuing this vendetta he led the United States into a "poison pill" trap laid by the wily, more intelligent Saddam Hussein. Second, he alienated his Machiavellian diplomats, spies and assassins by allowing his neo-conservative staff to go unpunished after attempting to arrange the death of a Diplomat's wife when he pointed out the President lied in his State of the Union Speech.


In April 2003, I wrote a commentary column in part about Saddam Hussein adopting the corporate "poison pill" hostile takeover defense strategy to use against the Bush invasion of Iraq.*

Saddam's strategy is working exceedingly well. Resistance to the American occupation is building and improving. The nature of the resistance has caused a breakdown in discipline among United States troops with the resulting over reactions adding to resistance forces and resources. It has created a situation for the Bush Administration where it can neither retreat nor go forward. The expeditionary force Bush sent into Iraq cannot be extracted, despite the fact soldiers are subject to daily depredations by snipers and guerrillas, because it would be an admission of total defeat. More forces cannot be sent into Iraq because that would be an admission of failed planning and strategy.

The cost of attempting to hold onto Iraq has become a black hole money pit for the United States economy which needs the resources for domestic reconstruction. President Bush's great great grand children will still be paying the bill for his vendetta against Saddam. United States soldiers may still be there searching for Saddam and hidden weapons of mass destruction in their time as well.

The Bush Administration will probably make repeated attempts to counteract the effects of Saddam's "poison pill" strategy through a series of restructuring and reorganizing exercises in Iraq. Unfortunately for Bush his Iraq occupation has already consumed a fatal dose of the "poison pill" and nothing short of divine intervention is likely to prevent its ultimate humiliating demise.

"Allies" in Europe are not sending troops to be killed because it would be domestic political suicide and leaders of nations specifically insulted and humiliated by Bush's surrogate intellectual goons are in no mood to help. Europeans are perfectly willing to watch Bush stew in the juices of his own arrogance and stupidity. They are also disinclined to support a Zionist puppet state blindly supporting Israel's suicidal tendencies in the Middle East. I think most Europeans probably understand that the current state of Israel is a doomed enterprise which will be gone in about twenty years.** They are perfectly satisfied to bide their time until the problems presented by Israel go away through natural processes.

Once it is understood that events in Iraq are facades for the personal clan feud between the Bush and Hussein houses, it is easy to see why Bush is losing. All Saddam must do to win is stay alive in the face of Bush's occupation of Iraq, which he is doing. Saddam does not even have to regain control of Iraq to win the feud, although he may somehow pull it off. Saddam has better survival skills than George W. Bush acquired during his pampered life.

It is possible that American forces could get lucky and succeed in locating and killing Saddam. This would be a definite loss for Saddam at family feud, but it would not end the adverse effects of the "poison pill" trap Bush has already fallen into. That blunder President Bush will have to live with the rest of his life, regardless of the amount of time Saddam has left on earth.


Any aspiring emperor needs the services and loyalty of an army, diplomatic corps, spies and assassins. Alienate any one of them and your aspirations are crippled. Alienate all four and the aspiring emperor commits suicide, both political and physical.

President Bush has driven his army to physical and emotion ruin. An ill-equipped undermanned expeditionary force was sent into Iraq justified by what have subsequently been revealed to be lies. Soldiers have been forced to work under conditions where they are nothing but sitting ducks for snipers and guerrilla attacks. Bush exacerbated their plight by inviting attacks against them with his chicken hawk macho "Bring'em on" declaration.

Expeditionary force members and their families have been repeatedly lied to about when they would be returning home.

Responsible commanders who correctly warned mistakes were being made were fired. Soldiers' pay has been cut in what are still active war zones and further pay cuts have been requested. The loyalty of reserve forces has been destroyed by needlessly disrupting their lives through extended call-ups for no other reason than to compensate for the consequences of falsehoods and incompetent leadership.

Disaster warnings from professional diplomats regarding the adverse consequences of invading Iraq were set aside for justifying "professional opinions" from the brown stained lips of neo-conservative sycophants. President Bush crowned his relationship with the diplomatic corps by doing nothing after someone in his administration attempted to engineer the murder of the CIA operative wife of diplomat Joseph Wilson. Wilson's affront was doing his job and reporting information that contradicted official falsehoods. Bush further exacerbated this bad situation by allowing Administration spin doctors to institute an ongoing political attack against Wilson and his wife.

In a Machiavellian driven government, the Emperor who betrays his spies and assassins must be made such a horrific negative example that no emperor ever contemplates the petty sacrifice of one of their lives again.

President George W. Bush has crossed a line that his spies and assassins cannot ignore out of their own Machiavellian self-interest and self-preservation. Bush's only hope of forgiveness is to stop the attacks against Wilson's CIA agent wife and mount the head of the fool who outed her clandestine status on a pike in front of the White House.

If Bush fails to act in his own best interest (and there is no indication he will do anything beyond paying lip service to an investigation), then the next election may be the least of his problems. At minimum, every vault and file drawer containing material documenting embarrassing or criminal information about Bush will be hauled out and dumped in the public domain. Bush can expect an election campaign that resembles Arnold Schwarzenegger's.

If the Bush Administration official who outed Plame's covert status still has two remaining active brain cells, they will be seeking to lease space in whatever secret hole Osama bin Ladin is hiding. FBI agents will not be the only people seeking their identity. The FBI agents will probably be the only ones wanting to make an example of them by sending them to prison.


President George W. Bush has publicly, by and through his neo-conservative staff, slapped the face of his army, his diplomats, his spies and assassins. One would think no politician on earth could be that stupid, yet, here we are.

Despite declarations of Democratic and Republican political ideology by Presidents, Senators and Representatives, the fundamental philosophy of applied government in Washington, D. C. is Machiavellian. When it comes to power, it is better to be feared than loved. The purest adherents and advocates of Machiavellian philosophy in Washington are found among the diplomats, spies and assassins.

Watching a "lets make an example of them no one will ever forget" war of retribution by Machiavellian diplomats, spies and assassins against a Bush led cult of Zionist neo-conservatives in the White House who believe themselves on a mission-from-God should be a historical spectacle to behold. In a war with these Machiavellians, Bush should not be surprised to find that his Jewish Zionist support has vanished and reappeared in the Wesley Clark Campaign. Why take the fool's side in such a conflict when the next likely President is also in the Zionist pocket? Jewish Zionists are not interested in seeing the destruction of their extensive spy and assassin network established in the United States that would flow from supporting Bush in a war with Machiavellian spies and assassins acting in there own vital interest. (If elected President, Wesley Clark will do nothing to shut down the Zionist spy and assassin network no matter how many American scientists are tossed off bridges or how much it costs us in national interest. It is one of Wesley Clark's few flaws, but a serious one.)

The spies and assassins have delivered their obligatory warning to the White House. It has been ignored.

Considering the variety of Bush Administration idiots that will be consumed in this self-ignited political conflagration in Washington, perhaps his White House will be labeled by future historians as the ship of fuels.

*"Brown Finger Bush"

**"The Inevitable Demise of Israel"

Copyright by James Roger Brown, October 5, 2003. All rights reserved.





James Roger Brown, SociologistSM

December 12, 2002

This week's questions came by e-mail from "philparke."

"What do you believe is the reason for the rampant drugging of children within the education system? How can parents' stop this action?"

We need not resort to beliefs to understand how this situation developed. Using the education system as a vehicle for increasing prescription drug consumption is one result of a shift in social perception from the school as an institution of education to the school as an unexploited marketing tool. This perceptual shift did not just occur among prescription drug manufacturers.

There are now a substantial number of special interest groups pursuing use of the education system to market products, ideas, beliefs, alternative lifestyles and "social services" under force of legal sanctions to generate revenue or force participation in activities a particular interest group desires to see occur or not occur. Some of these child exploitation special interests are food corporations, condom manufacturers, "counselors," mental health practitioners, religious groups, child protection service workers, homosexuals, dairy interests, teachers and principals desiring to keep their income (despite incompetence demonstrated by the superior academic performance of home schooling students), and other special interests. Schools have essentially been transformed into predatory zones with students as economic, ideological, junk science, sexual and other types of prey. With the influx of competing interests seeking to exploit the education system, schools have become economic, political and legal battlegrounds for issues that have nothing to do with education. Perhaps the dynamics of this exploitative process and Conflict can better be demonstrated using a less complex example.

There was a time within the memory of many of us still living when no vending machines were present in school buildings. Then carbonated beverage manufacturers convinced education system administrators to allow placement of vending machines dispensing canned or bottled soft drinks. They did so by going into business with the education system. Profits from each vending machine were shared with the school in which it was placed. A virtually universal provision of such contracts prohibited vending any other beverage products, such as milk and juice drinks. Milk and juice producers and distributors were not pleased. Competition developed to place vending machines dispensing other beverages in schools.

The social components of this process are listed below with web sites containing material that demonstrates each process.

Social processes of converting the education system into a marketing system exploiting students:

  1. Market Opened By First Product: School vending machine contracts and measures to exclude market penetration by other products: Coke Hires PR Flacks to Protect School Vending Machines: Coke Revises School Contracts:
  2. Market Competition Develops:
      1. "Experts" Identify Need or Benefit
        Cornell Food and Nutrition: Timely Topics - Putting Milk in School Vending Machines:
      2. Professional Associations Become Involved
        Food Systems Insider: Linking You Through The Food Chain: Vending machines promote milk to kids:
      3. Product And Service Producers Perceive New Market Potential
        Milk Vending: Bring Milk to School Kids!: Milk Vending in Elkhart County:
        PCC Natural Markets: Sound Consumer: Milk: Schools vending machines got milk and students are getting it, too:
  3. Congressmen And Legislators Become Advocates For Constituent Economic Interests
    [Senator Chuck] Schumer to NYC Schools: Got Milk? Topics:
    FREE PRESS: VENDING MACHINES IN SCHOOLS: What does pop really cost?:
  4. Market Conflict Results in Legislative "Investigations"
    National Conference of State Legislatures: Junk Food in Schools:
  5. 5. Education System Policy Decisions Become Business Decisions
    British Soft Drinks Association:
    NYSSBA Online: Issues in Education: Vending machines dispense cash to districts:
    Oregon State Website: FAQ - Beverage vending:
    THE PROFESSIONAL JOURNAL FOR EDUCATION: The Selling of Public Education:

The web site for the National Dairy Council Newsletter "Mealtime Sampler" at lists the following articles relating to vending milk in public schools:

These processes do not occur in sequence or isolation. They are dynamic interactive processes that take place concurrently after the initial product is introduced into the school system, in this case soft drinks. If we were to examine the equivalent literature for all the special interests involved in increasing prescription drug consumption through the education system we would be able to find similar documentation of these social processes for each of them.

It is necessary to understand these basic social processes to comprehend the additional special interests involved in converting the education system into a marketing system for increasing prescription drug consumption. The problem you ask about is substantially the product of ruthless antifamily and antimale political extremists in the feminist movement uniting with organized crime elements in the medical, mental health, social work, and child protection systems that have not been addressed by United State law enforcement agencies and the respective professional organizations. To mix some metaphors, in a situation with this many co-exploiters of children, no one wants to slit the throat of someone else's goat lest their own ox be gored.

To give some idea of the elemental issues involved in the use of the education system for artificially increasing prescription drug consumption as contrasted with increasing milk consumption, we can begin at the theoretical top of the legal food chain, international law. Both the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) (UNUDHR) and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) (UNCRC) recognize the Family as the basic unit of civilization, that its sanctity should be protected by society, and that it should have the authority and responsibility in child raising. Article 33 of the UNCRC states:

"Parties shall take all appropriate measures, including legislative, administrative, social and educational measures, to protect children from the illicit use of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances as defined in the relevant international treaties, and to prevent the use of children in the illicit production and trafficking of such substances."

The Nuremberg Medical Trials at the end of World War II established the international principal that no human being should be subjected to experimentation without their informed consent. Under United States Code and various State Codes, children are not capable of giving their informed consent until specifically identified ages for various purposes. Children prescribed and administered prescription drugs for fictitious problems, "educational purposes," or for purposes other than those uses the drug has been tested for effectiveness are being subjected to experimentation and exploitative abuse.

How can parents' stop this action?

Many states have enacted laws regarding deceptive and unconscionable trade practices. Depending upon State of residence, if you consult an attorney, you may discover that teachers, physicians, mental health and social work practitioners using methodology that produces false positive diagnosis of need for prescription drugs may violate deceptive and unconscionable trade practice restrictions for those operating businesses. Where such laws exist, they usually apply to any business operating in a State. Physicians, psychiatrists, psychologist, social workers and child protection system workers acting in concert with or as "agents" for businesses contriving to use diagnostic instruments or examinations to produce false positive diagnoses of the need for prescription drugs may be violating deceptive and unconscionable trade practice provision of State Code. You would need to consult an attorney in your respective State to determine the applicability of any unconscionable and deceptive trade practice law.

You may also discuss with an attorney the applicability of international law, accords, conventions and treaties to specific circumstances.

Shutting down the political, organized crime and corrupt professional interests that have acted in concert to convert the education system to into a system for marketing prescription drugs to children is a different problem. One thing to keep in mind is that allies might be found in other groups who oppose the increasing commercialization of the education system. Surprisingly this may include college professors and some teacher organizations. Many such groups may be unaware that the specific issue of concern to them is produced by the same basic problem behind using the education system to dispense prescription drugs to children. It might be possible to build a coalition of such groups around the central purpose of reversing the commercialization of the education system. Success at attempting this change should also alleviate the individual issues.

The basic options for prevailing in such a conflict with an alliance of political extremists and organized crime elements acting in concert, involve adopting appropriate strategy and tactics to:

The old saw that "all politics is local" definitely applies here. In many ways, County Sheriffs are the most powerful law enforcement positions in our system of government. County or district prosecutors with the same commitment should be elected or little change will result.

Many groups opposing the various ways children are exploited and abused through the education system may be making strategic and tactical errors in focusing on finding a solution at the national and public relations level. A more effective strategy would be to recruit candidates for County Sheriff and Prosecutor at the county or district level that are qualified to detect and prosecute these criminal elements. The key to winning in the political process will be building a coalition among relevant interests on the common goal of restoring education as the only focus of the education system. Deceptive attempts by any group participating in such a coalition to simply remove everything but what they want marketed through the education system will result in no change in the destructive process. Everyone is going to have to get their economic, religious, antireligious, political, criminal, professional, and any other noneducational finger out of the educational pie for the destruction to be reversed for the next generation of children. The irreparable damage has already been done to this generation. The ultimate litmus test will be whether groups seeking change really want the educational system restored in a way that will benefit children or their own special interest.

Despite the growing public awareness that the education system is being destroyed through the increasing diversion of time and resources into noneducational activities, including the dissipation of children's ability to learn through forced drugging, no person or group has successfully implemented a strategy to stop it. Many diverse interest groups must find a way to adopt a common strategy to effectively counteract the combined political, legal, criminal and economic resources available to the professions and drug manufacturers benefitting from exploiting the education system to increase prescription drug consumption and provide related services. Attempting to stop someone engaged in a criminal enterprise of this magnitude will be an ugly affair. It is reasonable to expect that anyone ruthless and brutal enough to profit from forcing children to take drugs that are unnecessary or destroy their minds and bodies will be decidedly unpleasant to stop. It may take a substantial army of Sheriffs or other dedicated law enforcement to put them out of business. This destruction will continue until someone organizes effective countermeasures.

Send in your questions by either of the following means:


Regular Mail:
P.O. Box 101
Worthington, KY 41183
Telephone: (606) 836-7613

This column is a corruption, fraud, junk science, and organized crime free zone. The Sociology of KnowledgeSM theory and derived methodology relied upon to respond to submitted questions were developed to comply with the testability, falsifiability, and refutability standards for distinguishing science from pseudoscience adopted by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 US 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786 (1993). No derived methodology or instrument is structured to produce false positive or false negative results when applied.


Individuals are responsible for the consequences of their own decisions. Any individual who must make a decision regarding problems encountered in the normal course of living is responsible for obtaining the information necessary to make an informed decision. No one should rely upon a single source of information in making a life changing decision or dealing with a specific crisis unless there is absolutely no alternative. Anyone who makes such a decision without making every effort possible to inform and prepare themselves is responsible for any adverse consequences resulting from that negligence. While responses to questions appearing in this column are based upon the application of a specific theory of the Sociology of KnowledgeSM and proprietary trade secret sociological methodology developed by James Roger Brown, SociologistSM, anyone choosing to act upon this information should only do so after determining all options, determining that the information applies to their specific situation and after comparing the information with other sources and perspectives to identify the best course of action for them under their respective circumstances. As has been the reality since the day you were born, proceed at your own risk and God be with you.

Copyright December 12, 2002, by James Roger Brown. All rights reserved.
No. 2002-001
Distributed by Quantum Boundary Issues Syndication.