ORGANIZED CRIME MANAGEMENT
IN GOVERNMENT
PART FIVE
THIS IS AMERICA! HOW CAN THIS BE DONE TO ME?
by
You cannot
make a revolution with silk gloves. (Joseph Stalin,
http://www.bemorecreative.com/one/630.htm)
A single death
is a tragedy, a million deaths is a statistic. (Joseph Stalin,
http://chatna.com/author/stalin.htm)
Throughout this series on organized criminal exploitation
of children, always keep in mind that it is the consequence and tool of an
alliance of political extremists and white collar criminals working in and
through government agencies and programs.
In addition to the logical fallacies used to construct
the junk science of participating mental health and social work practitioners,
other sophisticated techniques have been developed and used to take children
into State custody and destroy their families.
Child abuse investigators participating in this destructive enterprise
must have available reliable techniques to falsify evidence, falsify reports,
manipulate witnesses, coerce false confessions from accused individuals, and
obtain false testimony from alleged victims.
It must take a cold blooded, ruthless individual to
knowingly commit these acts upon innocent people who have never personally
wronged them, especially children.
While the ideology of the political extremists involved is of the
supremacist rather than communist persuasion, they share with communists the
attitudes expressed by Joseph Stalin.
These extremists, and their knowing allies, have been
successful at concealing their efforts, in part, because it is difficult for
people with some semblance of a traditional life to comprehend how such an
enterprise could be destroying people all around them without their
knowledge. Few people understand the
consequences of the wall of secrecy around the alleged child protection system,
including juvenile court, and the use of gag orders by Judges knowingly
participating.
A partial list of techniques developed by these political
extremists and criminals to obtain false statements from children include the
following:
1. Children
may be told that one or both parents are sick and for the parent(s) to receive
medical treatment the child must falsely state that their parent(s) abused or
molested them.
2. A child
may be told that other children interviewed have said the accused touched them
in a bad way and their supporting statement is needed to help the other
children.
3. If the
child's teacher, or someone else for whom the child may have affection, is the
target, the child may be told the teacher is sick and for them to get help, the
child must say that they were molested by the individual.
4. A child
may be told that if they do not admit to being molested by the target, other
children will be molested by him in the future.
5. A child
may be threatened with incarceration or prosecution if they continue to deny
they were molested or abused.
6. A child
may be placed on medication as punishment for continuing to deny they were
molested or abused.
7. Children
may be deprived of food and sleep until they enter a semi-hypnotic state in
which they become susceptible to influence and programming. (This can be accomplished in as little as
five to eight hours.)
The simple methods used to extract false statements from
children exploit emotional attachments, fears and the desire to please
adults. The more complex methods
involve programming and brainwashing techniques, frequently acquired from
military training and experience. Use
of the United States Armed Forces by political extremists to obtain free
training is not the exclusive domain of White Supremacists, militia members,
and middle eastern terrorists.
Political extremists intent on exploiting the child protection system
have also learned this trick.
HOW CORRUPT CHILD ABUSE INVESTIGATORS BRAINWASH CHILDREN TO LIE
A lie told
often enough becomes truth. Lenin
(Vladimir Ulyanov)
http://www.quoteland.com/qldb/author/263?qlSess=49fedd00f3a99d22ea3e4ffb95476d41
Among the expert services provided by the Author is an
instrument developed to test the hypothesis that there is no difference between
the characteristics of a specific case and the know characteristics of a false
child abuse allegation. The protocol
for applying the instrument requires documentary evidence, such as video tapes,
audio tapes, or written documents. The
following examples of techniques used to obtain false statements and testimony
from children are taken from cases in which the Author was consulted and
demonstrate specific characteristics of false allegations.
The first lengthy citation documents techniques used to
transform a child who says that no abuse or molestation occurred, into a child
who not only says abuse or molestation did occur, but can provide details
consistent with what the child abuse investigator wants to hear. Notes inserted into the transcript, describe
each step in the process used on this child.
The names have been removed and replaced with italicized descriptors to
conceal identities.
TRANSCRIPTS
FROM STATE ONE
Page 9, line 200-page 13, line 282 August 18,
1998 Alleged Victim interview by Detective One and Social Worker One
[NOTE: Detective One introduces Alleged Victim to the concept of
"secret touches".]
200 Do you know what secret touches are?
(Detective One)
201 What? (Alleged Victim)
202-203 Well that's when like if somebody
touches ya and they're not supposed to be touching ya. (Detective One)
204 Nope. (Alleged Victim)
205-206 Yeah. So what we wanna know from you
today Alleged Victim is if anybody
has ever touched your private places that wasn't supposed to. Has that ever
happened to you? (Detective One)
[NOTE: Detective One begins losing control of
the situation. Alleged Victim denies ever being the victim of "secret
touches".]
207 Uhm...uh...no. (Alleged Victim)
208 No? Has anybody ever touch [sic]
your cookie? (Detective One)
209 No. (Alleged Victim)
210 That wasn't supposed to? (Detective One)
211 No. (Alleged Victim)
212 What about uh...any boys or
anything? (Detective One)
[NOTE: Alleged Victim unsuccessfully attempts
to provide an acceptable response without naming anyone specific.]
213 Boys did it to it. (Alleged Victim)
214 Who did it? (Detective One)
215 Nobody (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Detective One attempts to regain control
of Alleged Victim by trying to evoke
positive feelings toward herself.]
216-217 Nobody? Wow! You're lucky. So have
you told somebody that somebody touched your cookie? (Detective One)
218 No. I didn't. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Alleged Victim makes another attempt to
provide a response that will be accepted by Detective
One without naming a specific individual.]
219 Did you tell your mommy that, that
somebody did it? (Detective One)
220 Somebody did. (Alleged Victim)
221 Huh? (Detective One)
222 I told mommy. (Alleged Victim)
223 You told your mommy that somebody
did? (Detective One)
224 Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Detective One persists and Alleged Victim provides the name
wanted.]
225 Who did you tell her did that? (Detective One)
226 Alleged
Perpetrator. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Detective One communicates to Alleged Victim that Alleged Perpetrator's name is acceptable and tests to see if Alleged Victim has accepted Alleged Perpetrator touching her
"cookie" as a real event.]
227 Alleged
Perpetrator? Okay. Did that really happen or was that just a made up thing.
(Detective One)
[NOTE: Alleged Victim recognizes that Alleged Perpetrator touching her
"cookie" is a fictitious event.
Detective One smoothly
transitions to evoking stronger positive emotions by coercing Alleged Victim to reestablish eye
contact and uses flattery on her by complimenting her eyes. Alleged
Victim initially verbally resists. ]
228 That's the make up thing. (Alleged Victim)
229-230 It was a make up thing? Okay. You
can look at me. Let me see those pretty eyes? (Detective One)
231 Uh-uh. (Alleged Victim)
232-233 Let me see what color they are
again, I forgot. Are they pink? Oh, they're brown, that's the color, they're
brown. They're pretty eyes. (Detective
One)
234 You have a pretty smile. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Detective One regains control of Alleged Victim's responses and retests
to see if Alleged Victim has accepted
Alleged Perpetrator touching her
"cookie" as a real event..]
235 So Alleged Victim... (Detective
One)
236 What? (Alleged Victim)
237 Uhm...So Alleged Perpetrator, he didn't really touch you? (Detective One)
238 Uh my mom's husband touched me. (Alleged Victim)
239 Your mom's husband? What's your
mom's husband's name. (Detective One)
240 Is Alleged Perpetrator. (Alleged
Victim)
241 Okay. (Detective One)
[NOTE: Alleged Victim makes a weaker attempt at
resistance by stating that there are two ******s. Detective One again
regains control by getting Alleged Victim
to name "Alleged Perpetrator"
as the perpetrator.]
242 There's two ******s, little
******...two ******s. Alleged Perpetrator,
little ******. (Alleged Victim)
243 Alleged
Perpetrator and little ******? (Detective
One)
244 Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
245 So which one touched you? (Detective One)
246 Alleged
Perpetrator. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Detective One tests Alleged Victim twice to determine if she has accepted Alleged Perpetrator touching her
"cookie" as a real event. Alleged Victim has accepted it as a real
event and begins giving consistent answers.]
247 Alleged
Perpetrator? Okay. So was it just a made up thing or did it really happen?
(Detective One)
248 It really happened. (Alleged Victim)
249 It did? Because just a minute ago,
you said maybe it was a made up thing. (Detective
One)
[NOTE: Alleged Victim makes another weak
attempt at resistance.]
250 Well it just..It really happened. (Alleged Victim)
251 Where did this happen at, can you
tell me that? (Detective One)
252 At the old [']partment*. (Alleged Victim)
253-254 The old apartment? Okay. Uhm...so
where was you [sic] mommy when this happened? (Detective One)
255 Uh her was at...at the store and Alleged Perpetrator touched me. (Alleged Victim)
256 What did he do, can you tell me, can
you tell me about it? (Detective One)
257 Huh-uh. (Alleged Victim)
258 Where did he touch you. (Detective One)
259 In my cookie. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Detective One now acts to erase any
remorse or guilt Alleged Victim might
feel about naming Alleged Perpetrator
as the perpetrator and communicates that she feels positively toward Alleged Victim. Detective
One draws Social Worker One into
the approval by name.]
260 In your cookie? Okay. Alright. Now
you know you're not in trouble, right? (Detective
One)
261 No. (Alleged Victim)
262 Okay. You're not in trouble at all,
okay. (Detective One)
263 Okay. (Alleged Victim)
264 And I'm not mad at you and Social Worker One's not mad at you okay?
265 Nope. (Social Worker One)
[NOTE: This
approval by Detective One and Social Worker One is generalized to
everyone. Alleged Victim indicates she has accepted it.]
266 Nobody's mad at you. (Detective One)
267 Okay. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Detective One now converts Alleged Victim's positive emotion and
acceptance, reminding Alleged Victim
that her help is needed to obtain more "details" about Alleged Perpetrator touching her
"cookie". Alleged Victim is well along the way to
being trained to lie and suppress remorse or guilt.]
268 But you know what Alleged Victim? (Detective One)
269 What? (Alleged Victim)
270 I need to know a little bit about
what happened, okay. (Detective One)
271 Okay. (Alleged Victim)
272 [']Cause I need to find out so I
need your help on that okay. (Detective
One)
273 Yeah. (Alleged Victim)
274 Okay. (Detective One)
275 Okay. (Alleged Victim)
276-277 So you said it happened in the old
apartment, what room were you guys in? (Detective
One)
278 In Alleged Perpetrator's bedroom. (Alleged
Victim)
279 Alleged
Perpetrator's bedroom? (Detective One)
280 And Brother was in his bedroom. (Alleged
Victim)
281 Okay. (Detective One)
282 And Alleged Perpetrator was touching my cookie. (Alleged Victim)
283 So you were in Brother..in..let's see, Alleged
Perpetrator's bedroom, right? (Detective
One)
284 Yeah. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Detective One resumes instructing Alleged Victim about good and bad
touches. Detective One further conditions and shapes Alleged Victim on providing answers consistent with Alleged Perpetrator touching Alleged Victim's
"cookie". There are several
good examples of leading questions.]
Page 13, line
290-page 15, line 331 August 18, 1998 Alleged
Victim interview by Detective One
and Social Worker One
290 That's Alleged Perpetrator's bedroom? (Detective
One)
291 Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
292 Okay. Were you on the floor, on the
bed or where were you at in there? (Detective
One)
293 On the bed. (Alleged Victim)
294-295 You were on the bed? Okay. So do you
remember what kind of a touch it was? (Detective
One)
296 No. (Alleged Victim)
297 I'll show you what I mean cause
there's different kinds of touches huh? (Detective
One)
298 (No audible response). (Alleged Victim)
299-302 Like you can punch somebody
(smacking sound), you can poke'em, you can rub'em like that (soft rubbing
sound), you can tickle'em, you can pinch'em, you can slap'em, you can flip'em.
There's a whole bunch huh? What kind of touch did Alleged Perpetrator do on you, that's what I need to know. (Detective One)
303 I don't know. (Alleged Victim)
304 Can you show me how he did it? (Detective One)
305 Uh-uh. (Alleged Victim)
306 What did he touch you with? (Detective One)
307 With his finger. (Alleged Victim)
308 With his finger? Okay. So he touched
your cookie with his finger? (Detective
One)
309 (No audible response). (Alleged Victim)
310 What kind of a touch was it? (Detective One)
311 (No verbal response). (Alleged Victim)
312 Okay. That's his finger like that,
right? (Detective One)
313 Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
314-315 So what did he do? If this is your
cookie and this is his finger, what did he do, can you show me? (Detective One)
316 (No verbal response). (Alleged Victim)
317-318 Did he just like...remember all the
touches I showed ya, there's pokes and there's rubs like that and you can
flip... (Detective One)
319 Well he touched me like this. (Alleged Victim)
320 Like a poke? (Detective One)
321 (Inaudible). (Alleged Victim)
322 Okay. And did he say anything to you
when that happened? (Detective One)
323 No, he didn't say nothing. (Alleged Victim)
324 Okay. Alleged Victim, why do you think he touched you, what was he doing.
(Detective One)
325 Just because. (Alleged Victim)
326 did he say anything to ya?(Detective One)
327 Uhm...no. (Alleged Victim)
328 He didn't? (Detective One)
329 No. (Alleged Victim)
330 Did he touch you with anything else?
(Detective One)
331 Uh he didn't. He...he just touched
me. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Detective One again communicates that
she needs Alleged Victim's help. Detective
One tests Alleged Victim again to
determine if she has accepted Alleged
Perpetrator touching her "cookie" as real. Detective
One has to reestablish eye contact to ensure she has control of the
situation. Detective One proceeds to get Alleged
Victim to elaborate on the reality she has accepted. Detective
One has moved Alleged Victim from
denying that anyone touched her "cookie" to accepting that Alleged Perpetrator touched it and Alleged Victim can now reliably provide
supporting "details".]
Page 15, line
334-page 19 line 410, August 18, 1998 Alleged
Victim interview by Detective One
and Social Worker One
334-335 No. Okay. And so now what I need you
to do Alleged Victim okay...Look at
me for just a second, I need to make sure... Remember when we talked about the
cookie jar? (Detective One)
336 Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
337-338 And there's telling the truth and
telling a lie huh? And you know what telling a lie is, don't ya? (Detective One)
339 (No verbal response). (Alleged Victim)
340 That's not... (Detective One)
341 No.
(Alleged Victim)
342 We only tell what happened huh? (Detective One)
343 Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
344-345 So what I wanna make sure, now...are
you telling me the...what really happened, the truth that Alleged Perpetrator touched you? (Detective One)
346 He really touched me. (Alleged Victim)
347 He really touched you? Okay. Did you
tell anybody about that? (Detective One)
348 No. (Alleged Victim)
349 How come? (Detective One)
350 Only I tell my mom. (Alleged Victim)
351 You told your mom? (Detective One)
352 Yep. (Alleged Victim)
353 Okay. Uhm...so did Alleged Perpetrator tell you not to
tell? (Detective One)
354 He said...he told me "Don't
tell nobody" and I did. (Alleged
Victim)
355 And you did? (Detective One)
356 Yeah because all wanted... I wanted
to tell somebody. (Alleged Victim)
357 Yeah. (Detective One)
358 Because all one...I wanna do it like
he said. (Alleged Victim)
359 You don't wanna do it like he said?
(Detective One)
360 Yeah. (Alleged Victim)
361 Okay. How did he say to do it? (Detective One)
362 Uhm..."Don't say it." (Alleged Victim)
363-364 Don't tell anybody? Okay. So how
many times did he touch you with his finger? (Detective One)
365 Rub it in. (Alleged Victim)
366 He what? I can't hear you honey. (Detective One)
367 Rub it in I said. (Alleged Victim)
368 He rubbed it in? (Detective One)
369 (No verbal response). (Alleged Victim)
370 Okay. So can you tell me how his
clothes were when he was doing that? (Detective
One)
371 He had his clothes on. (Alleged Victim)
372 He had'em on? Okay. What about your
clothes? (Detective One)
373 I had my clothes on too. (Alleged Victim)
374-375 You did? So...if I do uhm ... let's
see... how did... Did he touch you on top of your clothes or underneath your
clothes? (Detective One)
376 Underneath my clothes? (Alleged Victim)
377 Okay. What kind of pants did you
have on, do you remember? (Detective One)
378 Uhm...I don't know. (Alleged Victim)
379 Okay. If you don't remember, that's
okay. (Detective One)
380 I don't know what I was wearing. (Alleged Victim)
381 Okay. How did he uhm...how did he
get his finger under your clothes? (Detective
One)
382 Uhm...I don't know. (Alleged Victim)
383 Don't remember? (Detective One)
384 Don't remember. (Alleged Victim)
385 Okay. So but he touched you under
your clothes though? (Detective One)
386 (No verbal response). (Alleged Victim)
387 What about... Did you have underwear
on? (Detective One)
388 Yeah. (Alleged Victim)
389-390 Okay. did he touch you on top of
your underwear or underneath your underwear? (Detective One)
391 Underneath my underwear. (Alleged Victim)
392 Okay. Alright. Did you say anything
to him? (Detective One)
393 No I didn't. (Alleged Victim)
394-395 Okay. What did you...what... How did
it make you feel when he did that to ya? (Detective
One)
396 I feeled* bad. (Alleged Victim)
397 You feel bad? Okay. How else did you
feel? (Detective One)
398 Nothing. (Alleged Victim)
399 Were you scared? (Detective One)
400 (No verbal response). (Alleged Victim)
401 Were ya? Okay. What were you scared
of Alleged Victim? (Detective One)
402 I was scared, that's scary. (Alleged Victim)
403 Uh-huh. Okay. Is there anything else
that Alleged Perpetrator's done to
ya? (Detective One)
404 Alleged
Perpetrator's done...touched me. (Alleged
Victim)
405 Okay. (Detective One)
406 And then he didn't tell my mom. (Alleged Victim)
407 Uh-huh. (Detective One)
408 And...and I went and I told my mom
at grandpa's house. (Alleged Victim)
409 Uh-huh. (Detective One)
410 And I told her. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: The
divorced Father had a history of filing child abuse allegations against every
boyfriend of the custodial Mother and against Maternal relatives. By age three, the Alleged Victim had
undergone two and possibly three comprehensive genital physical examinations
resulting from molestation allegations filed by the Father. None of the physical examinations found
evidence of molestation.]
Page 21, line
460-page 23 line 498, August 18, 1998 Alleged
Victim interview by Detective One
and Social Worker One
460 Okay. Alleged
Victim did your dad tell you anything to tell us?(Detective One)
461 Uhm...he didn't. (Alleged Victim)
462 has your dad ever told you to tell
us about Alleged Perpetrator? (Detective One)
463 Yes. (Alleged Victim)
464 What did he say to ya, what did your
dad say to ya? (Detective One)
465 He didn't say...he... I don't know
what he said. (Alleged Victim)
466 Did he tell you that he wanted you
to tell us about Alleged Perpetrator?
(Detective One)
467 He didn't say that. (Alleged Victim)
468 He didn't? (Detective One)
469 No. (Alleged Victim)
470 Okay. (Detective One)
471 Oh, her did. (Alleged Victim)
472 What did she say? (Detective One)
473 Her said tell you guys. (Alleged Victim)
474 Tell us what? (Detective One)
475 About Alleged Perpetrator touching my cookie. (Alleged Victim)
476 Oh, okay. She told you that? (Detective One)
477 Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
478 Did she tell you that today or
another day? (Detective One)
479 Another day. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Detective One conducts another test of Alleged Victim's acceptance and
commitment to the constructed reality and ties it to benefiting Alleged Perpetrator. If Alleged
Victim has positive feelings remaining, she can believe that Alleged Perpetrator will benefit from
the constructed reality.]
480-481 Okay. Alright. so I'm just gonna
make sure Alleged Victim, you're
telling us the truth today? (Detective
One)
482 Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
483 The real truth, what rally happened?
(Detective One)
484 Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
485 [']Cause we don't want anybody to
get in trouble if they didn't do anything, do we? (Detective One)
486 Okay. (Alleged Victim)
487-488 [']Cause we don't want anybody to
get in trouble if they didn't do anything, do we? (Detective One)
489 No. (Alleged Victim)
490 No. But if somebody did something,
then we wanna help'em, don't we? (Detective
One)
491 Uh-huh. (Alleged Victim)
492 Okay. So are you telling us what
really happened? (Detective One)
493 (No verbal response). (Alleged Victim)
494 You're not making it up? (Detective One)
495 Nope. (Alleged Victim)
496-497 Okay. Alright. Do you have some
other questions, I'm sure I missed something. (Detective One)
498 Uhm...(inaudible)...think we're
fine. (Social Worker One)
[NOTE: Detective One previously communicated to
Alleged Victim that Doctor touches
were good touches. Despite undergoing
at least two vaginal exams by Doctors before this interview, Alleged Victim reports in the following
exchange that no one else has touched her in a bad way. Doctor
One reported in his Progress Notes on the second examination he conducted
that Alleged Victim resisted the
examination.]
Page 23, line
512-page 24, line 522, August 18, 1998 Alleged
Victim interview by Detective One
and Social Worker One
512 Okay. Alright. Has anybody else ever
done anything like this to ya? (Detective
One)
513 No. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Alleged Victim provides the "I
don't know" answer Detective One
communicated for Alleged Victim to
use when she could not anticipate the desired response. Detective
One again narrows the possible responses for Alleged Victim and Alleged
Victim indicates she does not like Alleged
Perpetrator. Detective One communicates her approval of the response.]
514 Okay. What do you think about Alleged Perpetrator? (Detective One)
515 I don't know. (Alleged Victim)
516 Do you like him? (Detective One)
517 No. (Alleged Victim)
518 You don't like him? (Detective One)
519 I don't like him no more. (Alleged Victim)
520 Uh-huh. How come you don't like him
no more? (Detective One)
521 Because he touched my cookie. (Alleged Victim)
522 Okay. Alright. (Alleged Victim)
[NOTE: Alleged Victim is given a reward
immediately after complying with the desires of Detective One. If this were
a POW or military criminal in custody who had been questioned, they would have
been offered cigarettes, food or another reward.]
Page 26, line
571-574, August 18, 1998 Alleged Victim
interview by Detective One and Social Worker One
571 You sure did a good job Alleged Victim and I really appreciate
ya talking to us, okay. (Detective One)
572 Okay. (Alleged Victim)
573-574 So we can go out now and you can
play with the toys and we'll talk to your mom, okay. (Detective One)
[NOTE: Alleged Victim answers questions about Alleged Perpetrator touching her
"cookie" with the conditioned responses created by Detective One during the 1998
interview. New details are added.]
Page 2-5,
April 19, 1999 Alleged Victim
interview by Detective Two
Detective Two: your
cookie, where's your cookie at? Right here, okay. And we talked about good
touch's and bad touch's, right. And you told me that if your mom gives you a
hug, then what kind of a touch was it.
Alleged Victim: why
people have things on right there shirt.
Detective Two: um
so they don't bother us, so people outside don't bother us. Okay now if your
mom gives you a hug will that be a good touch or a bad touch? If your mommy
gives you a hug.
Alleged Victim: good
touch
Detective Two: okay
and if somebody punch's you, is that a good touch or a bad touch?
Alleged Victim: bad
touch
Detective Two: okay
and if somebody touch's your private parts, is that a good touch or a bad
touch?
Alleged Victim: bad
touch
Detective Two: okay
now has anyone ever touched your private parts? Has anyone ever given you a bad
touch on your private part?
Alleged Victim: only
Alleged Perpetrator
Detective Two: only
Alleged Perpetrator, okay where did Alleged Perpetrator touch you? Right
there, okay where
Alleged Victim: and
on my bum
Detective Two: and
your bum, how did he touch your bum?
Alleged Victim: he
just does it on top of my clothes
Detective Two: hum,
okay,
Alleged Victim: he
makes bubbles
Detective Two: he
what, okay so when Alleged Perpetrator
touched your, where does Alleged
Perpetrator touch you? Where did Alleged
Perpetrator touch you?
Alleged Victim: cookie
and my bum
Detective Two: your
cookie and your bum, when Alleged
Perpetrator touched your cookie and your bum, where were you? Where did it
happen?
Alleged Victim: in
my mom's bedroom
Detective Two: in
your mom's bedroom, where was your mom when it happened?
Alleged Victim: at
work and my brother was at school
Detective Two: okay
when was the last time that he touched your cookie and your bum?
Alleged Victim: a...today
and tomorrow, yesterday
Detective Two: yesterday
Alleged Victim: and
today
Detective Two: yesterday
and today. okay what did Alleged Perpetrator touch your cookie with?
Alleged Victim: with
his finger
Detective Two: with
his finger,
Alleged Victim: and
then and then he does it the same thing, he does it to it, with his thumb and
the bum.
Detective Two: and
the bum okay, when he did it yes, or today and yesterday what were you wearing?
When he did that?
Alleged Victim: um
shorts
[NOTE: In
contrast to the sophisticated techniques to recover control of Alleged Victim's responses used by Detective One, Detective Two uses the less sophisticated response of attempting to
ignore unwanted responses. Implied in
this exchange is that Alleged Victim
for some reason associated participating in the interview with watching a
movie. Detective Two makes no effort to determine if Alleged Victim has been promised a reward for participating in the
interview.]
Detective Two: shorts
okay, when Alleged Perpetrator
touched your cookie and your bum, did he put his
Alleged Victim: when
we watching a movie.
Detective Two: you
were watching a movie
Alleged Victim: no,
when
Detective Two: when
are we going to watch a movie?
Alleged Victim: yeah
Detective Two: oh
I don't know, I don't know. Um let me ask you some more questions. Okay now
when Alleged Perpetrator touched your
cookie and your bum, did he put his hand, did he put his hands on top of your
shorts, was his hands on the top of your shorts or was his hand under your
shorts?
Alleged Victim: What's
this for?
Detective Two: it's
just to sit on,
Alleged Victim: um
a...
Detective Two: was
he touching your skin with his hand on your cookie or was he just touching your
pants?
Alleged Victim: my
skin
[NOTE: Alleged Victim uses the "I don't
know response" acquired from Detective
One for use in situations when Alleged
Victim cannot understand the response wanted, she then thinks of a possible
answer that will be acceptable.]
Detective Two: he
was touching your skin, what was he doing when he was touching your cookie?
What was he doing?
Alleged Victim: I
don't know
Detective Two: you
don't know? Okay
Alleged Victim: he
was putting his finger inside!!!!
Detective Two: inside
how do you know it was inside?
Alleged Victim: I
could just feel it.
Detective Two: you
could just feel it, okay what did it feel like?
Alleged Victim: real
hard
[NOTE: Detective Two ignores an unwanted
response from Alleged Victim and
again moves on.]
Page 5, April
19, 1999 Alleged Victim interview by Detective Two
Detective Two: just
on TV okay has anybody ever asked you to touch their private parts?
Alleged Victim: no
I don't
Detective Two: no
Alleged Victim: if
they tell me to, I don't do it, I run to my house
Detective Two: okay
good, good um did you tell somebody that Alleged
Perpetrator touched your private parts?
[NOTE: Alleged Victim expresses the negative
attitude toward Alleged Perpetrator
conditioned by Detective One during
the 1998 interview.]
Page 5, April
19, 1999 Alleged Victim interview by Detective Two
Detective Two: un-huh,
okay do you like Alleged Perpetrator?
Alleged Victim: uh-uh
Detective Two: how
come?
Alleged Victim: because
he touch's my private stuff.
[NOTE: Alleged Victim receives a toy to keep
after participating in the interview.]
Page 12,
April 19, 1999 interview of Alleged
Victim by Detective Two
Detective Two: okay
all right well should we go, go play, okay lets go play.
Alleged Victim: are
there some toys in there, lots of toys
Detective Two: yeah
there's toys out here, yeah you know what, you and your brother can come over
here and pick out a toy and you can keep it.
Alleged Victim: I
know I pick one of those
Detective Two: did
ya
Alleged Victim: I
take
Detective Two: well
take a look through here and see if there's one that you would like to keep.
And we'll see if your grandma wants some,
Alleged
Victim: people keep one of
these toys,
Detective Two: un-huh
you pick one
To purportedly increase professionalism and more
effectively utilize resources, several States have established child abuse
investigation centers where all the professionals needed to conduct
investigations work together with everything allegedly recorded. One argument made for funding these centers
is that fraud, corruption, and professional misconduct would be
eliminated. The transcript citations
demonstrating advanced child manipulation skills above were made at one of
these center. With no criminal
consequences for such conduct, it does not seem to matter to the knowing
participants whether such acts are videotaped or not.
States without specialized child abuse investigation
centers have the same brainwashing techniques in use. These organized crime management tools have been put in place
nation-wide over the approximately twenty eight year time period since
development of this system began. The
following transcript citations from another state demonstrate the emotional
manipulation of asking for the child's help to protect other children, asking
the child to help the investigator, and communicating that they are not in
trouble if false statements are made, some of the same techniques documented in
State One:
TRANSCRIPTS
FROM STATE TWO
Alleged Victim One Interview 1, page 5 line 19-22
Investigator One: Okay.
Well, you know if something else happened, some of the other boys may
have already told you about it. But I
need to hear it from you, okay?
Alleged Victim One: [unintelligible]
Alleged Victim One Interview 1, page 9 line 6-10
Investigator One: Well, you don't have to be scared of
me. You're not in trouble. But I need to know what happened so I can
make it stop - to keep him from doing those things again. I need your help. Are you sure there s nothing else you want to tell me?
Alleged Victim One: No.
Alleged Victim Two Interview 1, page 2 line 3-7
Investigator One:
Okay, let s start slowly. I can
tell You're real nervous.
Alleged Victim Two:
[Laughs]
Investigator One: You
don't have anything . . . you are not in trouble. You didn't do anything wrong and do I make you uncomfortable?
Alleged Victim Two:
Yeah.
These two cases were selected as examples because they
have another important common element.
“Detective One” and “Investigator One” are viewed as models of success
due to their high rates of finding "evidence" of child abuse and
molestation. They are both instructors
who train
child abuse investigators.
A somewhat novel, although not unique, feature of the
case from State Two is that the alleged perpetrator documented alibis for all
of the dates and times specified in the original charges. Upon being presented with this evidence, the
Prosecutor assembled and reinterviewed all the alleged victims who changed
their statements to report the alleged molestations occurred on dates they
could not specify in a three month time period. The alleged perpetrator's offer to submit to a polygraph
examination was rejected, after initial acceptance by the Prosecutor. The alleged perpetrator subsequently
submitted to and passed a polygraph examination.
How can you prevent a child
abuse investigator manipulating your child to lie?
May the forces
of evil become confused on the way to your house. George Carlin, http://www.cyber‑nation.com/victory/quotations/subjects/quotes_evil.html
There are two proactive practical solutions that can be
implemented. For different reasons,
both are ugly undertakings to contemplate.
One solution is to identify and remove all the political extremists and
criminals knowingly or willingly participating in the criminal exploitation of
children through the child protection, mental health, and social work
systems. The other solution is to train
your child from birth how to identify and resist all the techniques that could
be used by corrupt child abuse investigators to manipulate your child to lie
and falsely implicate you in abuse or molestation.
There is at least one possible passive solution, join
George Carlin in his invocation that "evil become confused on the way to
your house."
How to document the
manipulation of children in your state
Due to the wall of secrecy, it is virtually impossible to
obtain transcripts, audio tape recordings or view video tape recordings of
child abuse investigation interviews.
Child abuse investigation interviews, therapy or counseling sessions,
and social work sessions are not subject to freedom of information act requests
from the public.
The only possible means of locating transcripts, would be
searching case records maintained by the court clerk. In some cases, such as the two used here in which the Author was
a consultant, transcripts, audio and video tape copies can be obtained through
discovery and become part of the record when submitted as evidence at trial.
Moving on
The next installment in this series will continue
documentation of the techniques used by child abuse investigators to falsify
evidence, tamper with witnesses and obtain false confessions.
© Copyright February 26, 2001
by James Roger Brown. All rights
reserved.
THE
SOCIOLOGY CENTERTN
220
North Willow, Suite 222
North
Little Rock, AR 72114
Telephone:
(501) 374-1778
thesociologist@aol.com