ORGANIZED CRIME
MANAGEMENT IN GOVERNMENT
PART ONE
by
HOW IT BEGINS
1. ROOTING OUT
THE ROOTS OF EVIL!
Beware of
altruism. It is based on self-deception, the root of all evil. Excerpt from the notebooks of Lazarus Long, from
Robert Heinlein's "Time Enough for Love" from Rand Lindly’s Quotes
<http://www.quotationspage.com>
When solving
problems, dig at the roots instead of just hacking at the leaves. Anthony J. D'Angelo, The College Blue Book. Cole's Quotables
<http://www.quotationspage.com>
An ugly little scenario
It is 1973.1 You have a problem. You are frustrated by your inability to
control how other people live their lives.
You are certain you have special knowledge or genes that make you
superior to the ignorant masses. You
are one of the anointed, destined to move humanity into a glorious future. If only the rabble were not too stupid to
perceive your innate superiority.
Unfortunately, the ungrateful
ignorant masses would perceive what you want to do as the ravings of a lunatic
and would not want to turn control of their lives over to you willingly. How are you and the other anointed ones ever
going to get control and do what has to be done?
You discuss solving this problem
with your fellow anointed ones in Psychology and Social Work degree
programs. You find there are many
others who share your views that democracy was a mistake. Psychologists and Social Workers, who know
what is best because of their innate superiority, are the only people fit to be
in control of government. (The ideology
that psychologists, psychiatrists and social workers should run the government
is called psychocracy2.)
You discover that your views about
the inferiority of the masses have a long tradition in mental health. You discover some amazing statements by
Sigmund Freud that are inspirational for you:
“What is the use of Americans if they bring no
money?...They are not good for anything else....America is useful for nothing
else but to supply money....Is it not sad that we are materially dependent on
those savages who are not better-class human beings.” S. Freud, p.241, Freudian
Fraud, E. Fuller Torrey, MD.
“In the depths of my heart I can’t help being
convinced that my dear fellow men, with few exceptions, are worthless....I have
found little that is ‘good’ about human beings on the whole. In my experience
most of them are trash, no matter whether they publicly subscribe to this or
that ethical doctrine or to none at all.”
S. Freud, p. 243-244, Freudian
Fraud, E. Fuller Torrey, MD.
With your world view that the masses
are inferior and the anointed innately superior firmly validated, you and
others set about building a system to finance and orchestrate destruction of
the family, religion, democracy and other impediments to your plan to save
humanity from itself. The only viable
course of action is the same one Hitler used, infiltrate government
bureaucracies with allies and seize control by coup. Just as Hitler did, you will have to create emergencies which
what you need to achieve are the solution to.
Since you can not openly pursue your
goals, you must trick the great unwashed into cutting their own throats. You must make alliances of convenience with
other political extremists and economic interests. You must make common cause with intellectual bar sweepings who
are true believers in their outrageous claims, no matter what they are. People who are so intense, their passions
will persuade other people in the absence of any scientific proof of their
claims.3
Among other brilliant enterprises,
witnesses go before Congressional Committees on Child Welfare and testify that
a national and international network of Satanic Cults exists. Witnesses describe operations to breed
babies for human sacrifice, massive kidnapping networks to steal children for
evil purposes, entire communities and churches of Satanists hiding the
systematic and wholesale sexual abuse of children, tunnel systems are alleged
to exist under daycare centers where children are molested and forced to
participate in Satanic ceremonies.
It was a minor inconvenience that a
ten year FBI investigation found no evidence of such massive Satanic
conspiracies to exploit and abuse children.4 By then you and your fellow anointed ones
had the killing machine5 well under construction using conditional
federal funding you had obtained as a result of the testimony from quack
witnesses. You were eventually so
successful at integrating greed and personal aggrandizement to achieve your
goals that grand jury investigations and comprehensive documentation of the
atrocities being committed have failed to put a dent in the destructive
machine.6
After Congress enacted legislation
establishing conditional federal funding programs to achieve your destructive
goals, States had to get with your program if they wanted to receive the
federal funding. Over time, States were
forced to enact legislation that included establishing a corps of mandated
child abuse reporters who would be granted immunity for reporting anything,
true or false, yet allowed them to be sued for failure to report anything that
might possibly indicated child abuse.
The legislation placed a long list
of professionals in a position where they were afraid to use their own good
judgment. Children soon learned they
suddenly had obtained power and could ruin the lives of adults, parents,
teacher or anyone else, on whom they wanted to extract revenge for some
offense, real or imagined.
A Boolean search of United States
Code at <http://www4.law.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/empower> using the search
term “condition and federal funds or condition and federal funding” identified
1,203 matches incorporated into United States Legal Code (condit 6078, feder:
12443, fund: 9409). Conditional federal
funding is a powerful and successful tool used in an increasing number of areas
to establish public compliance with extremist and special interest
agendas.
A little example of the
scenario meeting the legal road
The end result of this intentional
corruption of government is ugly. The
Ninth Circuit case United States of America v. Charles Bighead
<http://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/web/newopinions.nsf/4bc2cbe0ce5be94e88256927007a37b9/698bd1927f235c3e88256927007e0229?OpenDocument>
provides a convenient comprehensive example:
In rebuttal, the government offered the expert
testimony of Tasha Boychuk, the director of forensic services at the Children's
Advocacy Center. Although she was not a psychiatrist or psychologist, Boychuk
testified about the general characteristics of child sexual abuse victims,
specifically about the characteristics of "delayed disclosure" and
"script memory." Boychuk based her opinions in part on interviews and
observations of some 1200 children who had alleged sexual abuse.
On cross-examination, Boychuk admitted that she had
no way of determining whether the subjects had actually been abused. Bighead
was convicted. On appeal, he contended that the district court erred in
admitting Boychuk's testimony because it lacked a foundation for expert opinion
evidence and went beyond her own observations. Bighead asserted that the
district court should have determined whether Boychuk's theories could be
tested, were subjected to peer review and publication, and were generally
accepted in the field. He also challenged the testimony as unhelpful to the
jury and more prejudicial than probative.
[1] Tests for the admissibility of expert scientific
testimony do not require exclusion of testimony that involves specialized
knowledge rather than scientific theory. Boychuk's testimony consisted of her
observations of typical characteristics drawn from years of experience
interviewing purported victims of child abuse. It was not an abuse of
discretion to permit it. She could have been, but was not, cross-examined about
the nature and extent of her reliance on any other source.
[2] Boychuk testified only about a class of victims
generally, not the particular testimony of the child victim in this case.
Boychuk's testimony had significant probative value in that it rehabilitated
(without vouching for) the victim's credibility after she was cross-examined
about the reasons she delayed reporting and inconsistencies in her testimony.
Boychuk's testimony went to disclosure for the purpose of assistance. The jury
was free to determine whether the victim delayed disclosure or simply
fabricated the incidents. Judge Noonan dissented, explaining his view that
Boychuk's testimony was inadmissible because it was based on interviews and
observations of children who claimed sexual abuse, but were not shown to have
been actual victims of the offenses they reported.
The full text of Judge Noonan’s
dissenting opinion in this case is a “must read.” It provides an excellent summary of the defective reasoning in
this case which is consistent with systemic corruption behind similar cases
that merely present a facade of justice.
2. THE LOVE OF CONDITIONAL
FEDERAL FUNDING IS THE ROOT OF ALL GOVERNMENT EVIL.
“A man should
not approach a cow that backs up to a tree stump.” Bubba
Ramdas*, revered country guru from Southern India.
The enticement behind conditional
federal funding is that your State will be paid if State legislation is enacted
requiring State citizens to comply with the agenda of the special interest that
obtained enactment of the authorizing federal legislation. Local politicians love to hold news
conferences announcing they have succeeded in obtaining federal funding and
projecting the economic impact in terms of new jobs or programs. Not covered at the press conference is the small
print that turns one segment of the State population into a cash crop that has
to be harvested. It may seem to be a
good deal, unless you are a member of the group being harvested.
The ugliest of the federally funded
citizen harvesting projects is the fraudulent child protection system. Structural
corruption in the child protection system will be the subject of the next
article in this series.
Exploring
Conditional Federal Funding Programs in Your State
1.
Contact your State grant clearing house and ask to be placed on their mailing
list for approved grant reports.
Receiving these regular reports will allow you to monitor who is
receiving federal funds and for what purpose.
You should also be able to review grant applications that were declined
at the grant clearing house. The
federally mandated purpose of the grant clearing house is to review and
coordinate all grant applications originating within the State to eliminate
redundant grant requests.
2.
File an FOIA request to review all the contracts issued by the State agency you
are interested in examining. Look for
contracts with service providers that process federal fund claims for the
agency. Look at how contractors are
compensated. Are they paid a flat fee
for processing the federal fund claims or are they paid a commission on the
increase in federal fund claims generated?
Important
Websites for Government Research
A possibly useful search term to
begin exploring federal grant administration in your State is
“intergovernmental services.”
1.
FIRSTGOV: Your first click to the US Government
<http://firstgov.gov/>
2.
FINANCENET: Financial Management in Government
<http://www.financenet.gov/>
3.
US STATE AND LOCAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
<http://www.financenet.gov/financenet/state/state.htm>
4.
STATE FINANCE OFFICES
<http://www.financenet.gov/financenet/state/offices.htm>
5.
STATE & LOCAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT DATABASE
<http://fnet.financenet.gov/webinator/cgi-bin/texis.exe/webinator/cgi-bin/exstatedb>
Some suggested lines of research are
to conduct searches using separately and together the name of your state and
“intergovernmental services.” The
results of such searches are quite revealing about how the current family and
citizen killing machine was constructed piece by piece over time by government
officials and employees engaged in apparently innocuous decisions and actions
as part of their governmental responsibilities.
6.
THE CONGRESSIONAL RECORD ONLINE VIA GPO ACCESS
<http://ww1.access.gpo.gov/GPOAccess/sitesearch/su_docs_aces/aces150.html>
The on-line Congressional Record
Archives are only available back to 1994.
*In
case it is not obvious from the name, Bubba Ramdas is a fictional guru created
in 1993 by James Roger Brown as a vehicle to introduce and use country style
witticism, euphemisms, and allegories to communicate or emphasize specific
insights.
Footnotes
1An excerpt from The Family Defense Manual by James Roger
Brown documenting the development and evolution of anti-family and anti-male
extremist ideology from the mid-1970’s. <http://www.politicalwomen.com/family.htm>
2Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, #1. A dangerous political
movement, Date: 05/06/98, Category: Editorial, Page: B9, Byline: JAMES ROGER
BROWN SPECIAL TO THE DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE.
Enter search term at <http://library.ardemgaz.com/>. Searches are free but the Arkansas
Democrat-Gazette charges $1.95 to read and download archived articles.
3See (1) Whores
of the Court: The Fraud of Psychiatric Testimony and the Rape of American
Justice, Margaret A. Hagen, Harper-Collins Publishers, Inc., New York
(1997); (2) The Myth of Repressed Memory,
Elizabeth Loftus, Saint Martin’s Press, Inc., New York (1996); (3) The Assault on Parenthood: How Our Culture
Undermines the Family, Dana Mack, Simon and Schuster, New York (1997); (4) Satan’s Silence: Ritual Abuse and the Making
of a Modern American Witch Hunt, Debbie Nathan, Harper-Collins, Inc., New
York (1996); (5) Making Monsters: False
Memories, Psychotherapy and Sexual Hysteria, Richard Ofshe, University of
California Press, Berkley (1996); (6) Victims
of Memory: Sex Abuse Accusations and shattered Lives, Mark Pendergrast,
Upper Access, Inc., Hinesburg (1996); (7) The
Child Abuse Industry, Mary Pride, Crossway Books, Wheaton (1986); (8) Children No More: How We Lost a Generation,
Brenda Scott, Huntington House Publishers, Lafayette (1995); (9) Out of Control: Who’s Watching Our Child
Protection Agencies, Brenda Scott, Huntington House Publishers, Lafayette
(1994); (10) Freudian Fraud: The
Malignant Effect of Freud’s Theory on American Thought and Culture, E.
Fuller Torrey, MD, Harper-Collins Publishers, Inc. (1993); (11) Accusations of Child Sexual Abuse,
Hollida Wakefield and Ralph Underwager, Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Limited,
Springfield (1988); (12) Diagnosis for
Disaster: The Devastating Truth About False Memory Syndrome and Its Impact on
Accusers and Families, Claudette Wassil-Grimm, Overlook Press, New York
(1996); (13) Wounded Innocents: The Real
Victims of the War Against Child Abuse, Richard Wexler, Prometheus Books,
Amherst (1995).
4See F.B.I. 1992 STUDY OF
CHILDHOOD RITUAL ABUSE <http://www.religioustolerance.org/ra_rep03.htm>
and GOVERNMENT STUDIES OF CHILDHOOD RITUAL ABUSE
<http://www.religioustolerance.org/ra_study.htm>.
5After the extremists and
organized criminal operations were well established, the truth began to creep
out but the extremists and criminals have yet to be removed. See:
(1)
TESTIMONY OF CAROL LAMB HOPKINS BEFORE THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON LABOR AND HUMAN
RESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, May 25, 1995
<http://home.rica.net/rthoma/hopkins.htm>;
(2)
Reason Public Policy Institute. Policy
Study No. 262, “Child Protection at the Crossroads: Child Abuse, Child
Protection, and Recommendations for Reform,” By Susan Orr, Ph.D., October 1999
<http://www.rppi.org/socialservices/ps262.html>; and
(3)(a)
San Diego County Grand Jury
<http://www.co.san-diego.ca.us/cnty/cntydepts/safety/grand/>. Go to the search engine and use the terms
“child abuse” and “Alicia W.”
(b)
Lifting the Veil: Examining the Child Welfare, Foster Care and Juvenile Justice
Systems <http://home.rica.net/rthoma/>.
This site probably has the most comprehensive database of critical
information documenting the problems rampant in the purported child protection
system. The following link will take
you directly to STUDIES, SURVEYS, AND AUDITS
<http://home.rica.net/rthoma/studies.htm>
See
especially the Grand Jury Reports section.
© Copyright October 6, 2000
by James Roger Brown. All rights
reserved.